International Harvester 606 vs Leyland 384

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

International Harvester 606

1961–1967

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Leyland 384

1969–1972

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 606 and the 384 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

7 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester 606 and Leyland 384, field by field
Field606384Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed53.2 hp70.0 hp+31% 384
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-221LEYLAND-MOTORS 38 TDdiffers
Displacement declared3.77 L
Maximum torque declared174 lb·ft · 236 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry single-plate clutchDry BORG & BECK double clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared3,351 lb · 1,520 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared543 rpm540 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared5,214 lb · 2,365 kg4,718 lb · 2,140 kg+11% 606
Wheelbase declared78.0 in · 1,981 mm80.0 in · 2,032 mm
Length declared134.0 in · 3,404 mm
Width declared68.6 in · 1,742 mm
Height declared61.8 in · 1,570 mm87.8 in · 2,230 mm+42% 384
Ground clearance declared18.2 in · 462 mm
Turning radius, braked declared9.7 ft · 2.95 m11.3 ft · 3.43 m+16% 384
Fuel tank declared90.9 qt · 86.0 L71.9 qt · 68.0 L+26% 606

International Harvester 606 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 606”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Farmall 460”

Leyland 384 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 384”