Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) vs Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1984–1989

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1993–1995

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the H-496 Turbo (A) and the MF 3075 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 3075 (A), field by field
Field	H-496 Turbo (A)	MF 3075 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	93.6 hp	93.7 hp	—
Engine declared	Hürlimann H-1104/9 WT	Perkins 1004-4 THR2	differs
Displacement declared	4.56 L	3.99 L	+14% H-496 Turbo (A)
Maximum torque declared	266 lb·ft · 360 N·m	261 lb·ft · 354 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	18.0 gpm · 68.0 L/min	13.2 gpm · 49.9 L/min	+36% H-496 Turbo (A)
Pressure declared	2,654 psi · 183 bar	2,277–2,350 psi · 157–162 bar	differs
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,947 lb · 3,151 kg	11,023 lb · 5,000 kg	+59% MF 3075 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,510 lb · 3,860 kg	9,733 lb · 4,415 kg	+14% MF 3075 (A)
Wheelbase declared	103.1 in · 2,620 mm	100.5 in · 2,553 mm	—
Length declared	173.2 in · 4,400 mm	179.6 in · 4,562 mm	—
Width declared	87.8 in · 2,230 mm	80.7 in · 2,049 mm	+9% H-496 Turbo (A)
Height declared	104.7 in · 2,660 mm	108.2 in · 2,749 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	—	16.9 in · 430 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	137.4 qt · 130.0 L	200.8 qt · 190.0 L	+46% MF 3075 (A)

Source

Source