VALMET 602 vs ZETOR 6711
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (2WD; 2WD / 4WD); they were not built in overlapping years (1978–1982; 1972–1977). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 602 | 6711 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 57.3 hp | 64.1 hp | +12% 6711 |
| Engine declared | VALMET 311 C | ZETOR Z-6701 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.30 L | 3.46 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 155 lb·ft · 210 N·m | 148 lb·ft · 201 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +20% 602 |
| Clutch declared | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | Pedal-actuated, dry two-stage ZETOR double clutch with mechanical clutch booster | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.2 gpm · 30.9 L/min | 5.3 gpm · 20.0 L/min | +54% 602 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,129 lb · 2,780 kg | 5,776 lb · 2,620 kg | +6% 602 |
| Wheelbase declared | 83.1 in · 2,112 mm | 88.5 in · 2,247 mm | +6% 6711 |
| Length declared | 137.3 in · 3,487 mm | 144.5 in · 3,670 mm | — |
| Width declared | 69.6 in · 1,769 mm | 70.5 in · 1,790 mm | — |
| Height declared | 99.2 in · 2,520 mm | 64.4 in · 1,635 mm | +54% 602 |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.9 in · 480 mm | 13.0 in · 330 mm | +45% 602 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | 11.7 ft · 3.56 m | +19% 6711 |
| Fuel tank declared | 68.7 qt · 65.0 L | 83.5 qt · 79.0 L | +22% 6711 |
VALMET 602 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 602”
ZETOR 6711 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711”