SAME Tiger 100 (DT) vs VALMET 1102 (-4)

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1977–1980

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1973–1980

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Tiger 100 (DT) and the 1102 (-4) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

SAME Tiger 100 (DT) and VALMET 1102 (-4), field by field
Field	Tiger 100 (DT)	1102 (-4)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	101 hp	100.6 hp	—
Engine declared	SAME DA 1055 P	VALMET 411 BS or 411 CS	differs
Displacement declared	5.19 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	269 lb·ft · 365 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% 1102 (-4)
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry Borg & Beck single-plate clutch	dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	9.2 gpm · 35.0 L/min	9.2 gpm · 35.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	6,482 lb · 2,940 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,311 lb · 3,770 kg	8,598 lb · 3,900 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	98.8 in · 2,510 mm	91.3 in · 2,320 mm	+8% Tiger 100 (DT)
Length declared	160.6 in · 4,080 mm	154.7 in · 3,930 mm	—
Width declared	83.5 in · 2,120 mm	78.0 in · 1,980 mm	+7% Tiger 100 (DT)
Height declared	105.5 in · 2,680 mm	106.7 in · 2,710 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+16% 1102 (-4)
Turning radius, braked declared	12.5 ft · 3.80 m	12.1 ft · 3.70 m	—
Fuel tank declared	137.4 qt · 130.0 L	102.5 qt · 97.0 L	+34% Tiger 100 (DT)

Source

Source