OLIVER 1465 vs VALMET 802/802-4
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1465 and the 802/802-4 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1465 | 802/802-4 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 75.9 hp | 80.9 hp | +7% 802/802-4 |
| Engine declared | OM C 03/70 | VALMET 411 CS | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.56 L | 4.40 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 206 lb·ft · 279 N·m | 226 lb·ft · 306 N·m | +10% 802/802-4 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +20% 802/802-4 |
| Clutch declared | Dry FERODO double clutch | Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.2 gpm · 23.5 L/min | 11.4 gpm · 43.0 L/min | +83% 802/802-4 |
| Pressure declared | 2,901 psi · 200 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 4,630 lb · 2,100 kg | 6,393 lb · 2,900 kg | +38% 802/802-4 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,499 lb · 2,948 kg | 7,802 lb · 3,539 kg | +20% 802/802-4 |
| Wheelbase declared | 92.8 in · 2,357 mm | 92.1 in · 2,339 mm | — |
| Length declared | 140.0 in · 3,556 mm | 151.2 in · 3,840 mm | +8% 802/802-4 |
| Width declared | 72.1 in · 1,831 mm | 77.6 in · 1,971 mm | +8% 802/802-4 |
| Height declared | 68.8 in · 1,748 mm | 98.4 in · 2,499 mm | +43% 802/802-4 |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.3 in · 516 mm | 18.9 in · 480 mm | +8% 1465 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 11.8 ft · 3.61 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 83.5 qt · 79.0 L | 95.1 qt · 90.0 L | +14% 802/802-4 |
OLIVER 1465 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1465”
VALMET 802/802-4 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 802”