Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) vs VALMET 1103/1103-4

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1990–1995

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1979–1980

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 3095 (A) and the 1103/1103-4 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) and VALMET 1103/1103-4, field by field
Field	MF 3095 (A)	1103/1103-4	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	105.5 hp	105.5 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1006-6 HR3	VALMET 411 CS	differs
Displacement declared	5.99 L	4.40 L	+36% MF 3095 (A)
Maximum torque declared	300 lb·ft · 407 N·m	273 lb·ft · 370 N·m	+10% MF 3095 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Open centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	—	9.2 gpm · 35.0 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	9,215 lb · 4,180 kg	7,165 lb · 3,250 kg	+29% MF 3095 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,645 lb · 4,375 kg	8,708 lb · 3,950 kg	+11% MF 3095 (A)
Maximum permissible mass declared	15,432 lb · 7,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	106.1 in · 2,696 mm	91.3 in · 2,320 mm	+16% MF 3095 (A)
Length declared	170.2 in · 4,323 mm	154.7 in · 3,930 mm	+10% MF 3095 (A)
Width declared	74.8 in · 1,899 mm	78.0 in · 1,980 mm	—
Height declared	109.2 in · 2,774 mm	106.7 in · 2,710 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.0 in · 457 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+14% 1103/1103-4
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.1 ft · 3.70 m	—
Fuel tank declared	182.8 qt · 173.0 L	102.5 qt · 97.0 L	+78% MF 3095 (A)

Source

Source