Massey Ferguson MF 2725 vs Renault 155-54 TX

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1985–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1989–1990

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MF 2725 and the 155-54 TX → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Massey Ferguson MF 2725 and Renault 155-54 TX, field by field
Field	MF 2725	155-54 TX	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	145.1 hp	143.1 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins AT 6.354-4 CC	MWM TD 226 B-6	differs
Displacement declared	5.80 L	6.23 L	+8% 155-54 TX
Maximum torque declared	364 lb·ft · 493 N·m	389 lb·ft · 528 N·m	+7% 155-54 TX
Transmission
Top speed declared	21.7 mph · 35 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled single-disc clutch	Dry LuK double clutch type DT 355/330	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	11.4 gpm · 43.1 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	15,917 lb · 7,220 kg	19,511 lb · 8,850 kg	+23% 155-54 TX
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	13,448 lb · 6,100 kg	14,881 lb · 6,750 kg	+11% 155-54 TX
Maximum permissible mass declared	16,535 lb · 7,500 kg	18,739 lb · 8,500 kg	+13% 155-54 TX
Wheelbase declared	107.3 in · 2,726 mm	107.9 in · 2,740 mm	—
Length declared	200.0 in · 5,080 mm	181.2 in · 4,603 mm	+10% MF 2725
Width declared	95.3 in · 2,420 mm	83.3 in · 2,116 mm	+14% MF 2725
Height declared	116.5 in · 2,960 mm	117.4 in · 2,983 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	19.3 in · 490 mm	19.0 in · 482 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	16.1 ft · 4.90 m	16.4 ft · 5.00 m	—
Fuel tank declared	225.1 qt · 213.0 L	158.5 qt · 150.0 L	+42% MF 2725

Source

Source