Leyland 384 vs VALMET 602
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (30%); they were not built in overlapping years (1969–1972; 1978–1982). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 9 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 384 | 602 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 70.0 hp | 57.3 hp | +22% 384 |
| Engine declared | LEYLAND-MOTORS 38 TD | VALMET 311 C | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.77 L | 3.30 L | +14% 384 |
| Maximum torque declared | 174 lb·ft · 236 N·m | 155 lb·ft · 210 N·m | +12% 384 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 8.2 gpm · 30.9 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,351 lb · 1,520 kg | 3,748 lb · 1,700 kg | +12% 602 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,718 lb · 2,140 kg | 6,129 lb · 2,780 kg | +30% 602 |
| Wheelbase declared | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | 83.1 in · 2,112 mm | — |
| Length declared | 134.0 in · 3,404 mm | 137.3 in · 3,487 mm | — |
| Width declared | 68.6 in · 1,742 mm | 69.6 in · 1,769 mm | — |
| Height declared | 87.8 in · 2,230 mm | 99.2 in · 2,520 mm | +13% 602 |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.2 in · 462 mm | 18.9 in · 480 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | +14% 384 |
| Fuel tank declared | 71.9 qt · 68.0 L | 68.7 qt · 65.0 L | — |
Leyland 384 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 384”
VALMET 602 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 602”