Leyland 384 vs OLIVER 1450 (4 WD)
13 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 384 and the 1450 (4 WD) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
13 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 384 | 1450 (4 WD) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 70.0 hp | 65.2 hp | +7% 384 |
| Engine declared | LEYLAND-MOTORS 38 TD | OM CO 2 D | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.77 L | 4.40 L | +17% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Maximum torque declared | 174 lb·ft · 236 N·m | 201 lb·ft · 272 N·m | +15% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 14.3 mph · 23 km/h | +30% 384 |
| Clutch declared | Dry BORG & BECK double clutch | Pedal operated dry double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 7.0 gpm · 26.5 L/min | +13% 384 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,351 lb · 1,520 kg | 4,023 lb · 1,825 kg | +20% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,718 lb · 2,140 kg | 5,997 lb · 2,720 kg | +27% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Wheelbase declared | 80.0 in · 2,032 mm | 85.4 in · 2,169 mm | +7% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Length declared | 134.0 in · 3,404 mm | 135.9 in · 3,452 mm | — |
| Width declared | 68.6 in · 1,742 mm | 58.3 in · 1,480 mm | +18% 384 |
| Height declared | 87.8 in · 2,230 mm | 58.1 in · 1,476 mm | +51% 384 |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.2 in · 462 mm | 18.3 in · 465 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.3 ft · 3.43 m | 12.5 ft · 3.80 m | +11% 1450 (4 WD) |
| Fuel tank declared | 71.9 qt · 68.0 L | 84.0 qt · 79.5 L | +17% 1450 (4 WD) |
Leyland 384 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 384”
OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”