Leyland 384 vs Massey Ferguson MF 575 (A)

15 material differences

Tractor one

Leyland 384

1969–1972

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Massey Ferguson MF 575 (A)

1976–1983

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 384 and the MF 575 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

15 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Leyland 384 and Massey Ferguson MF 575 (A), field by field
Field384MF 575 (A)Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed70.0 hp65.2 hp+7% 384
Engine declaredLEYLAND-MOTORS 38 TDPerkins A 4.236differs
Displacement declared3.77 L3.87 L
Maximum torque declared174 lb·ft · 236 N·m198 lb·ft · 268.2 N·m+14% MF 575 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h+20% 384
Clutch declaredDry BORG & BECK double clutchPedal-operated, dry and air-cooled single-plate clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min16.5 gpm · 62.5 L/min+108% MF 575 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared3,351 lb · 1,520 kg4,630 lb · 2,100 kg+38% MF 575 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540/1686 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared4,718 lb · 2,140 kg6,923 lb · 3,140 kg+47% MF 575 (A)
Wheelbase declared80.0 in · 2,032 mm87.5 in · 2,222 mm+9% MF 575 (A)
Length declared134.0 in · 3,404 mm149.2 in · 3,790 mm+11% MF 575 (A)
Width declared68.6 in · 1,742 mm74.0 in · 1,880 mm+8% MF 575 (A)
Height declared87.8 in · 2,230 mm98.8 in · 2,510 mm+13% MF 575 (A)
Ground clearance declared18.2 in · 462 mm15.4 in · 390 mm+18% 384
Turning radius, braked declared11.3 ft · 3.43 m12.3 ft · 3.74 m+9% MF 575 (A)
Fuel tank declared71.9 qt · 68.0 L103.8 qt · 98.2 L+44% MF 575 (A)

Leyland 384 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 384”

Massey Ferguson MF 575 (A) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 575 & 575A”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 168 & MF 168A”