John Deere-LANZ 100 vs Kramer KL 200

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1962–1966

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1958–1967

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 100 and the KL 200 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

John Deere-LANZ 100 and Kramer KL 200, field by field
Field	100	KL 200	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	17.7 hp	17.7 hp	—
Engine declared	John Deere 204	—	—
Displacement declared	1.18 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	—	64 lb·ft · 86 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	—
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry Fichtel and Sachs single-plate clutch	Single-plate dry clutch from Fichtel & Sachs	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	1.8 gpm · 7.0 L/min	4.2 gpm · 16 L/min	+129% KL 200
Pressure declared	—	1,707 psi · 118 bar	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,712 lb · 1,230 kg	2,800–3,153 lb · 1,270–1,430 kg	differs
Maximum permissible mass declared	4,409 lb · 2,000 kg	4,012 lb · 1,820 kg	+10% 100
Wheelbase declared	73.2 in · 1,860 mm	69.5–71.9 in · 1,765–1,825 mm	differs
Length declared	122.8 in · 3,120 mm	111.0–113.4 in · 2,820–2,880 mm	differs
Width declared	57.9 in · 1,470 mm	58.7–59.1 in · 1,490–1,500 mm	—
Height declared	54.6 in · 1,388 mm	59.8–61.8 in · 1,520–1,570 mm	differs
Ground clearance declared	14.8 in · 375 mm	13.8–15.7 in · 350–400 mm	differs
Fuel tank declared	31.7 qt · 30.0 L	25.4 qt · 24 L	+25% 100

Source

Source