J.I. Case 3294 vs Massey Ferguson MF 8250 A

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1984–1985

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1999–2002

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 3294 and the MF 8250 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 3294 and Massey Ferguson MF 8250 A, field by field
Field	3294	MF 8250 A	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	194.3 hp	182.6 hp	+6% 3294
Engine declared	CASE 504 BDT	VALMET 634 DSBAE	differs
Displacement declared	8.26 L	7.37 L	+12% 3294
Maximum torque declared	—	519 lb·ft · 703 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	+33% MF 8250 A
Clutch declared	—	Pedal operated hydraulic VALEO multi-plate clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	23.0 gpm · 87.1 L/min	30.9 gpm · 116.8 L/min	+34% MF 8250 A
Pressure declared	—	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	19,334 lb · 8,770 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	17,915 lb · 8,126 kg	16,480 lb · 7,475 kg	+9% 3294
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	104.0 in · 2,642 mm	121.5 in · 3,087 mm	+17% MF 8250 A
Length declared	182.0 in · 4,623 mm	198.8 in · 5,050 mm	+9% MF 8250 A
Width declared	96.0 in · 2,438 mm	84.2 in · 2,138 mm	+14% 3294
Height declared	116.9 in · 2,970 mm	126.0 in · 3,200 mm	+8% MF 8250 A
Ground clearance declared	22.5 in · 572 mm	21.7 in · 550 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	14.8 ft · 4.52 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	259.9 qt · 246.0 L	433.2 qt · 410 L	+67% MF 8250 A

Source

Source