J.I. Case 2090 vs J.I. Case 2094

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1978–1983

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1984–1985

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2090 and the 2094 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

J.I. Case 2090 and J.I. Case 2094, field by field
Field	2090	2094	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	118.4 hp	119 hp	—
Engine declared	CASE 504 BD	CASE 504 BD	—
Displacement declared	8.26 L	8.26 L	—
Maximum torque declared	318 lb·ft · 431 N·m	367 lb·ft · 497 N·m	+15% 2094
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet disc clutch	pedal operated wet disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	21.0 gpm · 79.5 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	9,921 lb · 4,500 kg	9,998 lb · 4,535 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,909–12,031 lb · 5,402–5,457 kg	14,189 lb · 6,436 kg	differs
Wheelbase declared	104.0 in · 2,642 mm	110.0 in · 2,794 mm	+6% 2094
Length declared	161.8 in · 4,110 mm	175.5 in · 4,458 mm	+8% 2094
Width declared	79.1 in · 2,010 mm	96.0 in · 2,438 mm	+21% 2094
Height declared	115.0 in · 2,921 mm	116.5 in · 2,960 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	21.0 in · 533 mm	19.5 in · 495 mm	+8% 2090
Turning radius, braked declared	11.8 ft · 3.61 m	13.5 ft · 4.11 m	+14% 2094
Fuel tank declared	259.9 qt · 246.0 L	259.9 qt · 246.0 L	—

Source

Source