International Harvester 184 vs John Deere-LANZ 100
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 184 and the 100 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 184 | 100 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 17.7 hp | 17.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-60 | John Deere 204 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 0.98 L | 1.18 L | +21% 100 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 7.5 mph · 12 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | +67% 100 |
| Clutch declared | — | pedal-operated dry Fichtel and Sachs single-plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 2.0 gpm · 7.6 L/min | 1.8 gpm · 7.0 L/min | +9% 184 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1800 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 1,618 lb · 734 kg | 2,712 lb · 1,230 kg | +68% 100 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 4,409 lb · 2,000 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 64.0 in · 1,626 mm | 73.2 in · 1,860 mm | +14% 100 |
| Length declared | 94.0 in · 2,388 mm | 122.8 in · 3,120 mm | +31% 100 |
| Width declared | 52.0 in · 1,321 mm | 57.9 in · 1,470 mm | +11% 100 |
| Height declared | 49.0 in · 1,245 mm | 54.6 in · 1,388 mm | +11% 100 |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.0 in · 330 mm | 14.8 in · 375 mm | +14% 100 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.0 ft · 2.44 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 30.0 qt · 28.4 L | 31.7 qt · 30.0 L | +6% 100 |
International Harvester 184 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC International 184”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Cub”
John Deere-LANZ 100 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere-Lanz 100”