International Harvester FG (MC Cormick-Deering) vs MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 81

4 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

International Harvester FG (MC Cormick-Deering)

1940–1951

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 81

1941–1946

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the FG and the M-H 81 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

4 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

International Harvester FG (MC Cormick-Deering) and MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 81, field by field
FieldFGM-H 81Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed19.6 hp20.8 hp+6% M-H 81
Engine declaredCONTINENTAL MFB-124
Displacement declared2.03 L
Transmission
Top speed declared9.3 mph · 15 km/h15.5 mph · 25 km/h+67% M-H 81
Clutch declaredPedal operated dry single plate clutchPedal operated dry Borg & Beck single disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Rear PTO speeds declared550 rpm540 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,924 lb · 1,780 kg2,674 lb · 1,213 kg+47% FG
Wheelbase declared78.3 in · 1,990 mm
Length declared122.0 in · 3,100 mm119.0 in · 3,023 mm
Width declared74.8 in · 1,900 mm
Height declared57.9 in · 1,470 mm58.0 in · 1,473 mm
Ground clearance declared9.1 in · 230 mm
Fuel tank declared58.1 qt · 55.0 L58.1 qt · 55.0 L

International Harvester FG (MC Cormick-Deering) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick FG”

MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 81 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 81”