IMT 588 vs Renault 80
14 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 588 and the 80 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
14 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 588 | 80 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 57.3 hp | 54.3 hp | +5% 588 |
| Engine declared | IMR-PERKINS M-34/T | MWM D 325-3 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.34 L | 2.55 L | +31% 588 |
| Maximum torque declared | 154 lb·ft · 209 N·m | 115 lb·ft · 156 N·m | +34% 588 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 13.7 mph · 22 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +14% 80 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated, dry two-stage KRON-NOVI double clutch | Dry Ferodo double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.0 gpm · 15.1 L/min | 6.1 gpm · 23.2 L/min | +54% 80 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,469 lb · 1,120 kg | 4,079 lb · 1,850 kg | +65% 80 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,071 lb · 2,300 kg | 3,627 lb · 1,645 kg | +40% 588 |
| Wheelbase declared | 83.4 in · 2,118 mm | 73.6 in · 1,870 mm | +13% 588 |
| Length declared | 146.3 in · 3,715 mm | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | +16% 588 |
| Width declared | 71.2 in · 1,808 mm | 51.2 in · 1,300 mm | +39% 588 |
| Height declared | 63.7 in · 1,618 mm | 52.0 in · 1,320 mm | +23% 588 |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.9 in · 430 mm | 14.2 in · 360 mm | +19% 588 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 12.5 ft · 3.80 m | 9.1 ft · 2.77 m | +37% 588 |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.8 qt · 50.0 L | 54.9 qt · 52.0 L | — |
IMT 588 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 558”
Renault 80 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 80 R7282”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 60 R7253”