IMT 539 vs URSUS 2812
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 539 and the 2812 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 539 | 2812 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 38.5 hp | 37.4 hp | — |
| Engine declared | IMR M-33/T-LP | URSUS 3250 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.50 L | 2.50 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 111 lb·ft · 150 N·m | 114 lb·ft · 155 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 14.9 mph · 24 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated, dry two-stage IKARUS-ZEMUM double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | 5.0 gpm · 18.8 L/min | +18% 2812 |
| Pressure declared | — | 3,002 psi · 207 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,249 lb · 1,020 kg | 3,012 lb · 1,366 kg | +34% 2812 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,175 lb · 1,440 kg | 4,453 lb · 2,020 kg | +40% 2812 |
| Wheelbase declared | 72.0 in · 1,830 mm | 76.0 in · 1,930 mm | +5% 2812 |
| Length declared | 117.0 in · 2,972 mm | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | +8% 2812 |
| Width declared | 64.0 in · 1,625 mm | 66.5 in · 1,690 mm | — |
| Height declared | 54.0 in · 1,372 mm | 88.2 in · 2,240 mm | +63% 2812 |
| Ground clearance declared | 21.0 in · 533 mm | 11.2 in · 285 mm | +87% 539 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.7 ft · 2.95 m | 10.8 ft · 3.30 m | +12% 2812 |
| Fuel tank declared | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | 61.3 qt · 58.0 L | +66% 2812 |
IMT 539 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 539”
URSUS 2812 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 2812”