Hürlimann 910.6 XT vs J.I. Case 1896 (DT)
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 910.6 XT and the 1896 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 910.6 XT | 1896 (DT) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 103.5 hp | 93.7 hp | +10% 910.6 XT |
| Engine declared | Hürlimann H-1000.6 W1 | CUMMINS B6T-590 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 6.00 L | 5.88 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 253 lb·ft · 343 N·m | 364 lb·ft · 493 N·m | +44% 1896 (DT) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry SLH single-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | 10.8 gpm · 41.0 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 6,598 lb · 2,993 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 10,031 lb · 4,550 kg | 11,850 lb · 5,375 kg | +18% 1896 (DT) |
| Wheelbase declared | 103.7 in · 2,635 mm | 108.0 in · 2,743 mm | — |
| Length declared | 175.2 in · 4,450 mm | 171.0 in · 4,343 mm | — |
| Width declared | 81.9 in · 2,080 mm | 101.1 in · 2,567 mm | +23% 1896 (DT) |
| Height declared | 106.9 in · 2,715 mm | 118.0 in · 2,997 mm | +10% 1896 (DT) |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.9 in · 455 mm | 16.0 in · 406 mm | +12% 910.6 XT |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 15.3 ft · 4.67 m | 13.1 ft · 3.99 m | +17% 910.6 XT |
| Fuel tank declared | 147.9 qt · 140.0 L | 259.9 qt · 246.0 L | +76% 1896 (DT) |
Hürlimann 910.6 XT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”
J.I. Case 1896 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”