Hürlimann 910.6 XT or J.I. Case 1896 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hürlimann 910.6 XT is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann 910.6 XT and J.I. Case 1896 (DT), with the call on each
Question910.6 XT1896 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?70.72 kW (94.84 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”71.5 kW (95.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 910.6 XT and the 1896 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 910.6 XT and the 1896 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1896 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,993 kg (6,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 910.6 XT.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,550 kg (10,031 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”5,375 kg (11,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 18% heavier (825 kg / 1,819 lb) than the Hürlimann 910.6 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 910.6 XT and the 1896 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”AheadThe Hürlimann 910.6 XT has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 910.6 XT and the 1896 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 910.6 XT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20041984–1985Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 910.6 XT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 1896 (DT) is 18% heavier (825 kg / 1,819 lb) than the Hürlimann 910.6 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann 910.6 XT has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the J.I. Case 1896 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann 910.6 XT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources