Ford 9600 (A) vs VOLVO-BM T 2650
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9600 (A) and the T 2650 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9600 (A) | T 2650 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 136.1 hp | 138 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Ford 401 DFT | VOLVO-BM TD 60 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 6.58 L | 5.48 L | +20% 9600 (A) |
| Maximum torque declared | 358 lb·ft · 485 N·m | 358 lb·ft · 485 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch | Pedal operated, dry multi-disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 16.0 gpm · 60.6 L/min | 12.4 gpm · 47.0 L/min | +29% 9600 (A) |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 7,055 lb · 3,200 kg | 7,496 lb · 3,400 kg | +6% T 2650 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 13,823 lb · 6,270 kg | 14,551 lb · 6,600 kg | +5% T 2650 |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.5 in · 2,324 mm | 107.9 in · 2,740 mm | +18% T 2650 |
| Length declared | 151.0 in · 3,835 mm | 177.2 in · 4,500 mm | +17% T 2650 |
| Width declared | 91.1 in · 2,314 mm | 91.7 in · 2,330 mm | — |
| Height declared | 117.0 in · 2,972 mm | 118.1 in · 3,000 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 27.0 in · 685 mm | 13.8 in · 350 mm | +96% 9600 (A) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.0 ft · 3.35 m | 15.1 ft · 4.60 m | +37% T 2650 |
| Fuel tank declared | 172.2 qt · 163.0 L | 221.9 qt · 210.0 L | +29% T 2650 |
Ford 9600 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9600”
VOLVO-BM T 2650 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Volvo T 2650”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 2650”