Ford 5095 vs Massey Ferguson MF 1102
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 5095 and the MF 1102 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 5095 | MF 1102 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 93.7 hp | 93.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Ford 2704 E | Eicher EDK 6 or EDK 6-3 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 5.95 L | 5.90 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 239 lb·ft · 324 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +20% MF 1102 |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 6.0 gpm · 22.7 L/min | 10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min | +76% MF 1102 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 6,834 lb · 3,100 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,614 lb · 3,000 kg | 9,259 lb · 4,200 kg | +40% MF 1102 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 14,330 lb · 6,500 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 99.6 in · 2,530 mm | 106.2 in · 2,698 mm | +7% MF 1102 |
| Length declared | 153.5 in · 3,900 mm | 160.6 in · 4,080 mm | — |
| Width declared | 76.8 in · 1,950 mm | 82.3 in · 2,090 mm | +7% MF 1102 |
| Height declared | 94.5 in · 2,400 mm | 67.9 in · 1,725 mm | +39% 5095 |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 17.7 in · 450 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 14.6 ft · 4.45 m | 19.0 ft · 5.80 m | +30% MF 1102 |
Ford 5095 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095”
Massey Ferguson MF 1102 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102”