Ford 2600 vs Nuffield 10/42

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1975–1981

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1964–1967

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2600 and the 10/42 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Ford 2600 and Nuffield 10/42, field by field
Field	2600	10/42	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	37.4 hp	42.6 hp	+14% 10/42
Engine declared	—	BMC 28 TA	—
Displacement declared	—	2.83 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	125 lb·ft · 169 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% 2600
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	8.3 gpm · 31.4 L/min	9.2 gpm · 35.0 L/min	+11% 10/42
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,800 lb · 1,270 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,816 lb · 1,731 kg	5,331 lb · 2,418 kg	+40% 10/42
Wheelbase declared	75.8 in · 1,925 mm	73.0 in · 1,854 mm	—
Length declared	127.0 in · 3,226 mm	115.0 in · 2,921 mm	+10% 2600
Width declared	65.5 in · 1,664 mm	67.7 in · 1,720 mm	—
Height declared	88.5 in · 2,248 mm	75.6 in · 1,920 mm	+17% 2600
Ground clearance declared	21.7 in · 550 mm	12.6 in · 320 mm	+72% 2600
Turning radius, braked declared	9.6 ft · 2.93 m	10.3 ft · 3.15 m	+8% 10/42
Fuel tank declared	51.9 qt · 49.1 L	67.2 qt · 63.6 L	+30% 10/42

Source

Source