Ford 1910 (A) vs Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A)
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 1910 (A) | MF 132 (A) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 31.5 hp | 29.6 hp | +6% 1910 (A) |
| Engine declared | ISHIKAWAJIMA-SHIBAURA T-853 A | Eicher EDK 2-3 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.70 L | 1.96 L | +15% MF 132 (A) |
| Maximum torque declared | 71 lb·ft · 96.1 N·m | 84 lb·ft · 114 N·m | +19% MF 132 (A) |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry DAIKIN double clutch | Pedal operated dry single disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.6 gpm · 32.5 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,816 lb · 1,731 kg | 3,307 lb · 1,500 kg | +15% 1910 (A) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,040 lb · 1,379 kg | 2,734 lb · 1,240 kg | +11% 1910 (A) |
| Wheelbase declared | 66.3 in · 1,684 mm | 63.0 in · 1,600 mm | — |
| Length declared | 122.4 in · 3,110 mm | 95.5 in · 2,425 mm | +28% 1910 (A) |
| Width declared | 57.5 in · 1,460 mm | 34.6 in · 879 mm | +66% 1910 (A) |
| Height declared | 86.6 in · 2,200 mm | 47.6 in · 1,209 mm | +82% 1910 (A) |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.4 in · 340 mm | 10.9 in · 277 mm | +23% 1910 (A) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.0 ft · 2.45 m | 12.6 ft · 3.85 m | +57% MF 132 (A) |
| Fuel tank declared | 36.8 qt · 34.8 L | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | — |
Ford 1910 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”
Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”