Ford 1910 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 1910 (A): three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Ford 1910 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (231 kg / 509 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Ford 1910 (A) and Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A), with the call on each
Question1910 (A)MF 132 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?21.1 kW (28.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”21.7 kW (29.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.5 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 132 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,731 kg (3,816 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”AheadThe Ford 1910 (A) has 15% more lift (231 kg / 509 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,379 kg (3,040 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”1,240 kg (2,734 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 1910 (A) is 11% heavier (139 kg / 306 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”6Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”AheadThe Ford 1910 (A) has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A).
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1910 (A) and the MF 132 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 132/A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19861970–1973Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 1910 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 1910 (A) has 15% more lift (231 kg / 509 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 1910 (A) is 11% heavier (139 kg / 306 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 1910 (A) has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 132 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 1910 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources