Claas Celtis 426 vs Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A)

5 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Claas Celtis 426

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A)

1999–2003

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; 2WD / 4WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

5 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Claas Celtis 426 and Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A), field by field
FieldCeltis 426MF 6235 (A)Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed74 hp74.0 hp
Engine declaredPerkins 1004.4 T
Displacement declared3.99 L
Maximum torque declared209 lb·ft · 283 N·m213 lb·ft · 289 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/h
Clutch declaredPedal-operated hydraulic VALEO multi-plate clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared18.2 gpm · 69 L/min
Pressure declared2,611 psi · 180 bar3,336 psi · 230 bar+28% MF 6235 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared9,370 lb · 4,250 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000/540E/1000E rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared8,223 lb · 3,730 kg8,422 lb · 3,820 kg
Maximum permissible mass declared17,637 lb · 8,000 kg
Wheelbase declared98.0 in · 2,489 mm97.8 in · 2,485 mm
Length declared149.8 in · 3,805 mm162.8 in · 4,134 mm+9% MF 6235 (A)
Width declared98.8 in · 2,510 mm75.7 in · 1,922 mm+31% Celtis 426
Height declared102.5 in · 2,604 mm104.4 in · 2,651 mm
Ground clearance declared15.0 in · 380 mm15.0 in · 380 mm
Fuel tank declared153.2 qt · 145 L137.4 qt · 130.0 L+12% Celtis 426

Claas Celtis 426 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426”
  • Source: OECD test report 2219, 2005

Massey Ferguson MF 6235 (A) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6235”