8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-Steyr M 975 a1995–2004No measured PTO figureTractor twoClaas Celtis 4262003–2008No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the M 975 a and the Celtis 426 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

8 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-Steyr M 975 a and Claas Celtis 426, field by field
FieldM 975 aCeltis 426Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed74 hp74 hp—
Engine declaredMWM 301.88 T——
Maximum torque declared—209 lb·ft · 283 N·m—
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredDry double clutch——
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared10.9 gpm · 41.4 L/min18.2 gpm · 69 L/min+67% Celtis 426
Pressure declared—2,611 psi · 180 bar—
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm / 1000 rpm540/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared6,834 lb · 3,100 kg8,223 lb · 3,730 kg+20% Celtis 426
Wheelbase declared87.8 in · 2,229 mm98.0 in · 2,489 mm+12% Celtis 426
Length declared149.3 in · 3,792 mm149.8 in · 3,805 mm—
Width declared74.8 in · 1,900 mm98.8 in · 2,510 mm+32% Celtis 426
Ground clearance declared15.7 in · 400 mm15.0 in · 380 mm+5% M 975 a
Fuel tank declared87.7 qt · 83.0 L153.2 qt · 145 L+75% Celtis 426

Height is not in this table. It is not one measurement: the sources measure it to different points — over the cab on some machines, over the steering wheel or the exhaust on others — and the same tractor measured two ways can differ by most of a metre. It appears here only when both machines' figures carry the point they were measured to and it is the same point, which is not the case for these two. Each machine's own page prints its height as its source gives it.

Case-Steyr M 975 a sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975”

Claas Celtis 426 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426”
  • Source: OECD test report 2219, 2005