Case-Steyr M 975 a or Claas Celtis 426?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Celtis 426 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Claas Celtis 426 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 67% (27.6 L/min / 7.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 975 a | Celtis 426 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 55 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Celtis 426 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 69 L/min (18.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426” | AheadThe Claas Celtis 426 has 67% more hydraulic flow (27.6 L/min / 7.3 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 975 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,100 kg (6,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 3,730 kg (8,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Claas Celtis 426 is 20% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 975 a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 20OECD test report 2219, 2005 | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 426” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2219, 2005 | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 975 a and the Celtis 426. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 975” | 4WDOECD test report 2219, 2005 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 2003–2008 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Claas Celtis 426 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Claas Celtis 426 has 67% more hydraulic flow (27.6 L/min / 7.3 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 975 a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Claas Celtis 426 is 20% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 975 a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Claas Celtis 426 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 975 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Celtis 426 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources