CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) vs New Holland TLA 80 (A)

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1990–1993

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2004–2008

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 895 (DT) and the TLA 80 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) and New Holland TLA 80 (A), field by field
Field	895 (DT)	TLA 80 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	82 hp	80.9 hp	—
Engine declared	IHC D-268	IVECO-NEF F4CE 0404 C	differs
Displacement declared	4.39 L	4.49 L	—
Maximum torque declared	209 lb·ft · 284 N·m	217 lb·ft · 294 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	21.7 mph · 35 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry Rockford single-plate clutch as driving clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	16.5 gpm · 62.4 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	3,118 psi · 215 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,351 lb · 2,427 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,863 lb · 3,113 kg	8,466 lb · 3,840 kg	+23% TLA 80 (A)
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	12,125 lb · 5,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	92.2 in · 2,342 mm	—
Length declared	142.0 in · 3,607 mm	171.7 in · 4,362 mm	+21% TLA 80 (A)
Width declared	78.0 in · 1,981 mm	78.9 in · 2,005 mm	—
Height declared	97.4 in · 2,474 mm	98.4 in · 2,499 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	22.0 in · 559 mm	14.8 in · 376 mm	+49% 895 (DT)
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.4 ft · 3.77 m	—
Fuel tank declared	118.3 qt · 112.0 L	111.0 qt · 105.0 L	+7% 895 (DT)

Source

Source