CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) or New Holland TLA 80 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 895 (DT) | TLA 80 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 53.9 kW (72.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 895 (DT) and the TLA 80 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 895 (DT) and the TLA 80 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 62.4 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 895 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,427 kg (5,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the TLA 80 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,113 kg (6,863 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 3,840 kg (8,466 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TLA 80 (A) is 23% heavier (727 kg / 1,603 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 895 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 895 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 895” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL 80 A (2004-2008)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 2004–2008 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TLA 80 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TLA 80 (A) is 23% heavier (727 kg / 1,603 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 895 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TLA 80 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources