Case-IH JX 1075 C vs Hürlimann XA 657

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2000–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the JX 1075 C and the XA 657 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH JX 1075 C and Hürlimann XA 657, field by field
Field	JX 1075 C	XA 657	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	75.0 hp	70.9 hp	+6% JX 1075 C
Engine declared	IVECO 8035.25	Hürlimann 1000.4 W-5	differs
Displacement declared	2.93 L	4.00 L	+36% XA 657
Maximum torque declared	201 lb·ft · 273 N·m	170 lb·ft · 231 N·m	+18% JX 1075 C
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry LuK double clutch	Pedal operated dry single plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	16.9 gpm · 63.9 L/min	9.0 gpm · 34.1 L/min	+87% JX 1075 C
Pressure declared	2,466 psi · 170 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+24% XA 657
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,309 lb · 2,408 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/540/1000E/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,919 lb · 2,685 kg	5,864 lb · 2,660 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	10,582 lb · 4,800 kg	11,023 lb · 5,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	83.9 in · 2,130 mm	86.1 in · 2,186 mm	—
Length declared	135.4 in · 3,440 mm	153.5 in · 3,900 mm	+13% XA 657
Width declared	73.5 in · 1,867 mm	76.0 in · 1,930 mm	—
Height declared	94.9 in · 2,410 mm	92.7 in · 2,355 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	15.7 in · 400 mm	+14% XA 657
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.5 ft · 3.80 m	—
Fuel tank declared	79.3 qt · 75.0 L	95.1 qt · 90.0 L	+20% XA 657

Source

Source