Case-IH CX 80 vs Claas Celtis 436

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Case-IH CX 80

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Claas Celtis 436

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1998–2000; 2003–2008). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

8 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 80 and Claas Celtis 436, field by field
FieldCX 80Celtis 436Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed82.9 hp83 hp
Engine declaredPERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR
Displacement declared3.99 L
Maximum torque declared225 lb·ft · 305 N·m246 lb·ft · 333 N·m+9% Celtis 436
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredPedal-operated dry single-disc clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared16.1 gpm · 60.8 L/min18.2 gpm · 69 L/min+13% Celtis 436
Pressure declared2,698 psi · 186 bar2,611 psi · 180 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared8,543 lb · 3,875 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared8,664 lb · 3,930 kg8,289 lb · 3,760 kg
Maximum permissible mass declared13,228 lb · 6,000 kg
Wheelbase declared92.8 in · 2,356 mm98.0 in · 2,489 mm+6% Celtis 436
Length declared156.7 in · 3,980 mm152.4 in · 3,872 mm
Width declared82.7 in · 2,100 mm98.8 in · 2,510 mm+20% Celtis 436
Height declared99.2 in · 2,520 mm104.5 in · 2,654 mm+5% Celtis 436
Ground clearance declared13.0 in · 330 mm16.5 in · 420 mm+27% Celtis 436
Turning radius, braked declared14.7 ft · 4.48 m
Fuel tank declared163.8 qt · 155.0 L153.2 qt · 145 L+7% CX 80

Case-IH CX 80 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX80”

Claas Celtis 436 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 436”
  • Source: OECD test report 2220, 2005