Case-IH CS-63 vs John Deere 2200 (A)
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the CS-63 and the 2200 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | CS-63 | 2200 (A) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 62.2 hp | 62.2 hp | — |
| Engine declared | PERKINS 903-27 T | ZETOR 7201 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.70 L | 3.60 L | +33% 2200 (A) |
| Maximum torque declared | 176 lb·ft · 239 N·m | 166 lb·ft · 225 N·m | +6% CS-63 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Dry double clutch | Dry Zetor double clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.1 gpm · 30.8 L/min | 10.8 gpm · 41.0 L/min | +33% 2200 (A) |
| Pressure declared | — | 1,160 psi · 80 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 5,556 lb · 2,520 kg | 8,135 lb · 3,690 kg | +46% 2200 (A) |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,490 lb · 2,490 kg | 6,978 lb · 3,165 kg | +27% 2200 (A) |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 12,125 lb · 5,500 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 83.3 in · 2,117 mm | 88.8 in · 2,256 mm | +7% 2200 (A) |
| Length declared | 139.0 in · 3,530 mm | 148.6 in · 3,775 mm | +7% 2200 (A) |
| Width declared | 74.8 in · 1,900 mm | 73.8 in · 1,875 mm | — |
| Height declared | 92.9 in · 2,360 mm | 104.9 in · 2,665 mm | +13% 2200 (A) |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 16.1 in · 410 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 77.1 qt · 73.0 L | 74.0 qt · 70.0 L | — |
Case-IH CS-63 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS52/a”
John Deere 2200 (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200”