Case-IH CS-63 or John Deere 2200 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2200 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 46% (1,170 kg / 2,579 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CS-63 | 2200 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46.4 kW (62.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 46.4 kW (62.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CS-63 and the 2200 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CS-63 and the 2200 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.8 L/min (8.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | AheadThe John Deere 2200 (A) has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,520 kg (5,556 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 3,690 kg (8,135 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | AheadThe John Deere 2200 (A) has 46% more lift (1,170 kg / 2,579 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 3,165 kg (6,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2200 (A) is 27% heavier (675 kg / 1,488 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the CS-63. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | AheadThe Case-IH CS-63 has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CS-63 and the 2200 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CS-63. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS63/a” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2200” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2001–2004 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CS-63 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2200 (A) has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2200 (A) has 46% more lift (1,170 kg / 2,579 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2200 (A) is 27% heavier (675 kg / 1,488 lb) than the Case-IH CS-63 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-63 has 60% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2200 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-63 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS-63 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2200 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources