Case-IH 9280 vs New Holland TJ-380
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9280 and the TJ-380 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9280 | TJ-380 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 374.8 hp | 374.8 hp | — |
| Engine declared | CUMMINS NTA-855 A | IVECO Cursor-13 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 10.02 L | 12.88 L | +29% TJ-380 |
| Maximum torque declared | 1,265 lb·ft · 1,715 N·m | 1,291 lb·ft · 1,751 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Oil-immersed multi-plate driving clutch with disc diameter 228.6 mm | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 30.3 gpm · 114.7 L/min | 40.6 gpm · 153.7 L/min | +34% TJ-380 |
| Pressure declared | 2,306 psi · 159 bar | 3,263 psi · 225 bar | +42% TJ-380 |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 24,011 lb · 10,891 kg | 19,632 lb · 8,905 kg | +22% 9280 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 34,674 lb · 15,728 kg | 41,780 lb · 18,951 kg | +20% TJ-380 |
| Wheelbase declared | 76.5–132.6 in · 1,943–3,368 mm | 154.0 in · 3,911 mm | differs |
| Length declared | 299.6 in · 7,610 mm | 297.6 in · 7,558 mm | — |
| Width declared | 153.1 in · 3,890 mm | 145.0 in · 3,683 mm | +6% 9280 |
| Height declared | 152.4 in · 3,870 mm | 143.0 in · 3,631 mm | +7% 9280 |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.7 in · 424 mm | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 1,001.7 qt · 948.0 L | 1,199.9 qt · 1,135.5 L | +20% TJ-380 |
Case-IH 9280 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9270”
New Holland TJ-380 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”