Case-IH 9280 or New Holland TJ-380?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the New Holland TJ-380 is ahead on hydraulic flow and forward gears; the Case-IH 9280 is ahead on three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 9280 and New Holland TJ-380, with the call on each
Question9280TJ-380Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?256.5 kW (344.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”258.8 kW (347.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9280 and the TJ-380.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9280 and the TJ-380.
Which pumps more oil for implements?114.7 L/min (30.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”153.7 L/min (40.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”AheadThe New Holland TJ-380 has 34% more hydraulic flow (39.0 L/min / 10.3 gpm) than the Case-IH 9280 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,891 kg (24,011 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”8,905 kg (19,632 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”AheadThe Case-IH 9280 has 22% more lift (1,986 kg / 4,378 lb) than the New Holland TJ-380 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?15,728 kg (34,674 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”18,951 kg (41,780 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TJ-380 is 20% heavier (3,223 kg / 7,105 lb) than the Case-IH 9280 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9280 and the TJ-380.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”AheadThe New Holland TJ-380 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Case-IH 9280 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9280.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9280 and the TJ-380.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9280”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ380”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19952005–2007Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TJ-380 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TJ-380 has 34% more hydraulic flow (39.0 L/min / 10.3 gpm) than the Case-IH 9280 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 9280 has 22% more lift (1,986 kg / 4,378 lb) than the New Holland TJ-380 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TJ-380 is 20% heavier (3,223 kg / 7,105 lb) than the Case-IH 9280 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TJ-380 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Case-IH 9280 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TJ-380 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources