Case-IH 9260 vs J.I. Case 4890
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (1990–1994; 1979–1983). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9260 | 4890 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 296.0 hp | 296.0 hp | — |
| Engine declared | CUMMINS LTA-10 | SAAB-SCANIA 11-L | differs |
| Displacement declared | 10.01 L | 8.26 L | +21% 9260 |
| Maximum torque declared | 984 lb·ft · 1,334 N·m | 487 lb·ft · 660 N·m | +102% 9260 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Oil-immersed multi-disc clutch | Hydraulically operated wet disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 28.0 gpm · 106.0 L/min | 24.0 gpm · 90.8 L/min | +17% 9260 |
| Pressure declared | 2,306 psi · 159 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 14,703 lb · 6,669 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 30,135 lb · 13,669 kg | 25,750 lb · 11,680 kg | +17% 9260 |
| Wheelbase declared | 124.0 in · 3,150 mm | 110.0 in · 2,794 mm | +13% 9260 |
| Length declared | 259.1 in · 6,580 mm | 243.0 in · 6,172 mm | +7% 9260 |
| Width declared | 104.8 in · 2,661 mm | 99.0 in · 2,515 mm | +6% 9260 |
| Height declared | 139.1 in · 3,532 mm | — | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.8 in · 402 mm | 18.0 in · 457 mm | +14% 4890 |
| Fuel tank declared | 799.9 qt · 757.0 L | — | — |
Case-IH 9260 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9260”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 9250”
J.I. Case 4890 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 4890”