AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) vs Massey Ferguson MF 1102

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1979–1980

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1970–1976

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the MF 1102 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 1102, field by field
Field	Rodeo 95 (DT)	MF 1102	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	93.7 hp	93.7 hp	—
Engine declared	V.M.-MOTORI 1054 SU-Turbo	Eicher EDK 6 or EDK 6-3	differs
Displacement declared	3.81 L	5.90 L	+55% MF 1102
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+20% MF 1102
Clutch declared	Dry VALEO or LuK dual clutch	Dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min	10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min	+33% MF 1102
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,049 lb · 2,290 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	7,430 lb · 3,370 kg	9,259 lb · 4,200 kg	+25% MF 1102
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	98.4 in · 2,500 mm	106.2 in · 2,698 mm	+8% MF 1102
Length declared	167.3 in · 4,250 mm	160.6 in · 4,080 mm	—
Width declared	79.9 in · 2,030 mm	82.3 in · 2,090 mm	—
Height declared	103.5 in · 2,630 mm	67.9 in · 1,725 mm	+52% Rodeo 95 (DT)
Ground clearance declared	16.5 in · 420 mm	17.7 in · 450 mm	+7% MF 1102
Turning radius, braked declared	11.8 ft · 3.60 m	19.0 ft · 5.80 m	+61% MF 1102
Fuel tank declared	153.2 qt · 145.0 L	—	—

Source

Source