AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 1102?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1102 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Rodeo 95 (DT) | MF 1102 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1102 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the MF 1102. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the MF 1102. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1102 has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MF 1102. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,370 kg (7,430 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 is 25% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 95 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1102 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 1102. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1102” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1980 | 1970–1976 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.0 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 is 25% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1102 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1102 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources