AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) vs Ford 5095
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the 5095 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Rodeo 95 (DT) | 5095 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 93.7 hp | 93.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | V.M.-MOTORI 1054 SU-Turbo | Ford 2704 E | differs |
| Displacement declared | 3.81 L | 5.95 L | +56% 5095 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 239 lb·ft · 324 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Dry VALEO or LuK dual clutch | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 7.9 gpm · 30.0 L/min | 6.0 gpm · 22.7 L/min | +32% Rodeo 95 (DT) |
| Pressure declared | 3,118 psi · 215 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 5,049 lb · 2,290 kg | 6,834 lb · 3,100 kg | +35% 5095 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 7,430 lb · 3,370 kg | 6,614 lb · 3,000 kg | +12% Rodeo 95 (DT) |
| Wheelbase declared | 98.4 in · 2,500 mm | 99.6 in · 2,530 mm | — |
| Length declared | 167.3 in · 4,250 mm | 153.5 in · 3,900 mm | +9% Rodeo 95 (DT) |
| Width declared | 79.9 in · 2,030 mm | 76.8 in · 1,950 mm | — |
| Height declared | 103.5 in · 2,630 mm | 94.5 in · 2,400 mm | +10% Rodeo 95 (DT) |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.5 in · 420 mm | — | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 11.8 ft · 3.60 m | 14.6 ft · 4.45 m | +24% 5095 |
| Fuel tank declared | 153.2 qt · 145.0 L | — | — |
AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 90”
Ford 5095 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095”