AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) or Ford 5095?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5095 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 12% (370 kg / 816 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Rodeo 95 (DT) | 5095 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5095 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the 5095. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the 5095. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) has 32% more hydraulic flow (7.3 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the Ford 5095 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,290 kg (5,049 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 3,100 kg (6,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | AheadThe Ford 5095 has 35% more lift (810 kg / 1,786 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,370 kg (7,430 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is 12% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the Ford 5095 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the 5095. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 5095 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Rodeo 95 (DT) and the 5095. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 5095 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Rodeo 95” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 5095” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 5095 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1980 | 1968–1975 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) has 32% more hydraulic flow (7.3 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the Ford 5095 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 5095 has 35% more lift (810 kg / 1,786 lb) than the AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is 12% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the Ford 5095 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 5095 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 5095 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 5095 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The AGRIFULL Rodeo 95 (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Rodeo 95 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5095 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources