AGRIFULL 60 DT vs Massey Ferguson MF 155

13 material differences

Tractor one

1976–1977

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1969–1976

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 60 DT and the MF 155 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

AGRIFULL 60 DT and Massey Ferguson MF 155, field by field
Field	60 DT	MF 155	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	53.2 hp	53.2 hp	—
Engine declared	V.M.-MOTORI 1053 SU	Perkins AD 4.203	differs
Displacement declared	2.86 L	3.34 L	+17% MF 155
Maximum torque declared	127 lb·ft · 172 N·m	153 lb·ft · 208 N·m	+21% MF 155
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	+25% 60 DT
Clutch declared	dry VALEO or LuK double clutch	Pedal operated dry and air-cooled MF double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.8 gpm · 22.0 L/min	4.3 gpm · 16.4 L/min	+34% 60 DT
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	3,001 psi · 207 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,668 lb · 1,210 kg	3,638 lb · 1,650 kg	+36% MF 155
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,027 lb · 2,280 kg	4,850 lb · 2,200 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	84.4 in · 2,145 mm	78.3 in · 1,990 mm	+8% 60 DT
Length declared	143.7 in · 3,650 mm	129.5 in · 3,290 mm	+11% 60 DT
Width declared	68.5 in · 1,740 mm	72.4 in · 1,840 mm	+6% MF 155
Height declared	93.7 in · 2,380 mm	61.4 in · 1,560 mm	+53% 60 DT
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	15.4 in · 390 mm	+18% MF 155
Turning radius, braked declared	—	9.4 ft · 2.87 m	—
Fuel tank declared	84.5 qt · 80.0 L	71.9 qt · 68.0 L	+18% 60 DT

Source

Source