AGRIFULL 60 DT or Massey Ferguson MF 155?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 60 DT and Massey Ferguson MF 155, with the call on each
Question60 DTMF 155Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the MF 155.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the MF 155.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”16.4 L/min (4.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”AheadThe AGRIFULL 60 DT has 34% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 155 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,210 kg (2,668 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”1,650 kg (3,638 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 155 has 36% more lift (440 kg / 970 lb) than the AGRIFULL 60 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,280 kg (5,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the MF 155.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60 DT and the MF 155.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”AheadThe AGRIFULL 60 DT has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 155 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 155.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 155”AheadThe AGRIFULL 60 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 155 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19771969–1976Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 60 DT is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT has 34% more hydraulic flow (5.6 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 155 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 155 has 36% more lift (440 kg / 970 lb) than the AGRIFULL 60 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 155 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT is available with four-wheel drive; the Massey Ferguson MF 155 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The AGRIFULL 60 DT is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources