AGRIFULL 60 DT vs Ford 3055 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1976–1977

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1971–1975

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 60 DT and the 3055 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

AGRIFULL 60 DT and Ford 3055 (A), field by field
Field	60 DT	3055 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	53.2 hp	53.2 hp	—
Engine declared	V.M.-MOTORI 1053 SU	Ford 182 DF	differs
Displacement declared	2.86 L	3.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	127 lb·ft · 172 N·m	139 lb·ft · 188 N·m	+9% 3055 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	12.4–15.5 mph · 20–25 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	dry VALEO or LuK double clutch	Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.8 gpm · 22.0 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	2,668 lb · 1,210 kg	2,800 lb · 1,270 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,027 lb · 2,280 kg	4,224 lb · 1,916 kg	+19% 60 DT
Wheelbase declared	84.4 in · 2,145 mm	77.2 in · 1,960 mm	+9% 60 DT
Length declared	143.7 in · 3,650 mm	135.0 in · 3,430 mm	+6% 60 DT
Width declared	68.5 in · 1,740 mm	72.0 in · 1,830 mm	—
Height declared	93.7 in · 2,380 mm	93.3 in · 2,370 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	19.5 in · 495 mm	+50% 3055 (A)
Fuel tank declared	84.5 qt · 80.0 L	51.8 qt · 49 L	+63% 60 DT

Source

Source