AGRIFULL 60 DT or Ford 3055 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 60 DT | 3055 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 39.7 kW (53.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the 3055 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the 3055 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3055 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,210 kg (2,668 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 1,270 kg (2,800 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,280 kg (5,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 1,916 kg (4,224 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 60 DT is 19% heavier (364 kg / 802 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 60 DT and the 3055 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 60 DT and the 3055 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 60” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3055” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1977 | 1971–1975 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 60 DT is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGRIFULL 60 DT is 19% heavier (364 kg / 802 lb) than the Ford 3055 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL 60 DT is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 60 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources