AGRIFULL 355-C vs J.I. Case 770

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1976–1977

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1969–1973

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 355-C and the 770 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

AGRIFULL 355-C and J.I. Case 770, field by field
Field	355-C	770	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	55.3 hp	56.2 hp	—
Engine declared	V.M.-MOTORI 1053	CASE A 267	differs
Displacement declared	2.86 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	127 lb·ft · 172 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	6.2 mph · 10 km/h	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Hand lever operated dry single disc clutch with dead center engagement	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	5.3 gpm · 20.0 L/min	16.0 gpm · 60.6 L/min	+203% 770
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,335 lb · 2,420 kg	9,050 lb · 4,105 kg	+70% 770
Wheelbase declared	47.2 in · 1,200 mm	101.0 in · 2,565 mm	+114% 770
Length declared	86.6 in · 2,200 mm	153.0 in · 3,886 mm	+77% 770
Width declared	45.2 in · 1,147 mm	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	+95% 770
Height declared	42.7 in · 1,085 mm	67.0 in · 1,702 mm	+57% 770
Ground clearance declared	11.0 in · 280 mm	15.0 in · 381 mm	+36% 770
Turning radius, braked declared	—	11.4 ft · 3.48 m	—
Fuel tank declared	47.6 qt · 45.0 L	200.0 qt · 189.3 L	+321% 770

Source

Source