Agco RT-120 A vs Case-IH Puma 140

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2006–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-120 A and the Puma 140 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-120 A and Case-IH Puma 140, field by field
Field	RT-120 A	Puma 140	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	141.1 hp	140.0 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 66 CTA-4V	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	differs
Displacement declared	6.60 L	6.73 L	—
Maximum torque declared	479 lb·ft · 649 N·m	441 lb·ft · 598 N·m	+9% RT-120 A
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal operated electrohydraulic VALEO multi-plate clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	27.2 gpm · 102.8 L/min	30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min	+12% Puma 140
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,466 psi · 170 bar	+35% RT-120 A
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	13,300 lb · 6,033 kg	13,889 lb · 6,300 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	111.3 in · 2,827 mm	109.8 in · 2,789 mm	—
Length declared	183.3 in · 4,656 mm	175.2 in · 4,449 mm	—
Width declared	79.3 in · 2,014 mm	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	+7% Puma 140
Height declared	116.2 in · 2,951 mm	117.5 in · 2,985 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	16.9 in · 430 mm	18.7 in · 475 mm	+10% Puma 140
Fuel tank declared	412.1 qt · 390.0 L	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	+30% RT-120 A

Source

Source