7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneAgco RT-100 A2006–2007No measured PTO figureTractor twoCase-IH Puma 1252007–2010No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-100 A and the Puma 125 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

7 material differences · 10 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-100 A and Case-IH Puma 125, field by field
FieldRT-100 APuma 125Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed126.2 hp125.3 hp—
Engine declaredSISU-DIESEL 66 CTA-4VIVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EDDdiffers
Displacement declared6.60 L6.73 L—
Maximum torque declared409 lb·ft · 555 N·m411 lb·ft · 557 N·m—
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredPedal-operated electrohydraulic Valeo multi-plate clutch——
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centreClosed centre—
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensingLoad sensing—
Pump flow declared30.4 gpm · 115.1 L/min27.7 gpm · 104.9 L/min+10% RT-100 A
Pressure declared3,336 psi · 230 bar2,466 psi · 170 bar+35% RT-100 A
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared11,993 lb · 5,440 kg13,261 lb · 6,015 kg+11% Puma 125
Maximum permissible mass declared—23,149 lb · 10,500 kg—
Wheelbase declared111.3 in · 2,827 mm109.8 in · 2,789 mm—
Length declared183.3 in · 4,656 mm175.2 in · 4,449 mm—
Width declared79.3–100.4 in · 2,014–2,550 mm85.2–114.2 in · 2,165–2,900 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared116.2 in · 2,951 mm117.5 in · 2,985 mm—
Ground clearance declared16.9 in · 430 mm17.7 in · 450 mm—
Fuel tank declared412.1 qt · 390.0 L317.0 qt · 300.0 L+30% RT-100 A

Agco RT-100 A sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100 A”

Case-IH Puma 125 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 125”
  • Source: OECD test report 2470, 2009