Agco RT-100 A vs Case-IH Puma 125

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2006–2007

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2010

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-100 A and the Puma 125 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 10 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-100 A and Case-IH Puma 125, field by field
Field	RT-100 A	Puma 125	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	126.2 hp	125.3 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 66 CTA-4V	IVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EDD	differs
Displacement declared	6.60 L	6.73 L	—
Maximum torque declared	409 lb·ft · 555 N·m	411 lb·ft · 557 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated electrohydraulic Valeo multi-plate clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.4 gpm · 115.1 L/min	27.7 gpm · 104.9 L/min	+10% RT-100 A
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,466 psi · 170 bar	+35% RT-100 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	10,543 lb · 4,782 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,993 lb · 5,440 kg	13,261 lb · 6,015 kg	+11% Puma 125
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	111.3 in · 2,827 mm	109.8 in · 2,789 mm	—
Length declared	183.3 in · 4,656 mm	175.2 in · 4,449 mm	—
Width declared	79.3 in · 2,014 mm	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	+7% Puma 125
Height declared	116.2 in · 2,951 mm	117.5 in · 2,985 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	16.9 in · 430 mm	17.7 in · 450 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	412.1 qt · 390.0 L	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	+30% RT-100 A

Source

Source