WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-45 A vs ZETOR 4712

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1968–1970

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1972–1977

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the WT-45 A and the 4712 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-45 A and ZETOR 4712, field by field
Field	WT-45 A	4712	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	44.4 hp	44.4 hp	—
Engine declared	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-154	ZETOR Z-4701	differs
Displacement declared	2.52 L	2.59 L	—
Maximum torque declared	124 lb·ft · 168 N·m	106 lb·ft · 144 N·m	+17% WT-45 A
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% WT-45 A
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated, two-stage dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch	Pedal-operated dry two-stage double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	5.3 gpm · 20.0 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	3,968 lb · 1,800 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,299 lb · 1,950 kg	4,519 lb · 2,050 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	79.3 in · 2,015 mm	78.3 in · 1,988 mm	—
Length declared	131.9 in · 3,350 mm	124.4 in · 3,160 mm	+6% WT-45 A
Width declared	61.0 in · 1,550 mm	68.0 in · 1,727 mm	+11% 4712
Height declared	57.5 in · 1,460 mm	63.0 in · 1,600 mm	+10% 4712
Ground clearance declared	15.4 in · 390 mm	11.7 in · 298 mm	+31% WT-45 A
Turning radius, braked declared	—	11.2 ft · 3.40 m	—
Fuel tank declared	43.3 qt · 41.0 L	49.7 qt · 47.0 L	+15% 4712

Source

Source