WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 vs Warchalowski WT-30 B
6 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (2WD / 4WD; 2WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
6 material differences · 9 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | WT-32 | WT-30 B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 29.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144 | WARCHALOWSKI E-212 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.36 L | 1.73 L | +36% WT-32 |
| Maximum torque declared | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutch | pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | 2,646 lb · 1,200 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,395 lb · 1,540 kg | 3,109 lb · 1,410 kg | +9% WT-32 |
| Wheelbase declared | 77.6 in · 1,970 mm | 78.1 in · 1,985 mm | — |
| Length declared | 128.3 in · 3,260 mm | 124.0 in · 3,150 mm | — |
| Width declared | 60.2 in · 1,530 mm | 65.7 in · 1,670 mm | +9% WT-30 B |
| Height declared | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.6 in · 395 mm | 17.7 in · 450 mm | +14% WT-30 B |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 7.9 ft · 2.40 m | 7.9 ft · 2.40 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | — |
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”
Warchalowski WT-30 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 30B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 30”