VALMET 6400-4 vs ZETOR 9641
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 6400-4 and the 9641 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 6400-4 | 9641 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 93.7 hp | 93.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | VALMET 420 DS/420 DW/420 DWRE/44 ET | SDF Z-1300 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.40 L | 4.16 L | +6% 6400-4 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 254 lb·ft · 344 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal-operated dry single-plate clutch | Pedal-operated, dry Zetor single-disc clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 18.0 gpm · 68.2 L/min | 15.3 gpm · 58.0 L/min | +18% 6400-4 |
| Pressure declared | — | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 12,434 lb · 5,640 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 9,259 lb · 4,200 kg | 9,766 lb · 4,430 kg | +5% 9641 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 16,535 lb · 7,500 kg | 14,771 lb · 6,700 kg | +12% 6400-4 |
| Wheelbase declared | 91.6 in · 2,326 mm | 94.0 in · 2,388 mm | — |
| Length declared | 173.5 in · 4,408 mm | 189.6 in · 4,815 mm | +9% 9641 |
| Width declared | 78.1 in · 1,985 mm | 85.2 in · 2,165 mm | +9% 9641 |
| Height declared | 107.7 in · 2,735 mm | 106.9 in · 2,715 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 18.1 in · 460 mm | 14.3 in · 362 mm | +27% 6400-4 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 13.8 ft · 4.20 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 174.4 qt · 165.0 L | 190.2 qt · 180.0 L | +9% 9641 |
VALMET 6400-4 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6400”
ZETOR 9641 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”